Project Update: May 9, 2025
Information Meeting: Sage Mesa Water System Acquisition Assessment
Date: Thursday, June 12, 2025
Time: 6:30 to 7:30 pm
Location: West Bench Elementary School, 1604 West Bench Drive, Electoral Area “F”
Parking is available in the gravel lot north of the school or West Bench Drive.
Meeting hosts:
- Riley Gettens, Electoral Area “F” Director
- RDOS Public Works and Legislative Services senior staff
Special guests:
- Amelia Boultbee, MLA (Penticton-Summerland)
- Al Aderichin, P. Eng., Head, Water Utilities Engineering, Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship
- Judi Ekkert, B.Sc., Specialist Environmental Health Officer, Drinking Water Systems Program,
Environmental Public Health - Interior Health
Reason for the meeting:
- Provide a high-level review of the 2024 Engineering and Financial Assessments
- Introduce the assent voting (referendum) process
- Provide residents with an opportunity to ask questions and share feedback with special guests,
Director Gettens, and RDOS senior staff
Important notes:
- No new funding announcements are planned at this time.
- This is a follow-up session to the public meeting held on Wednesday, October 30, 2024.
- A third public information meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, September 10, 2025.
- The assent vote is anticipated to be scheduled in November 2025.
Assent and advance voting dates will be advertised via mail-out and RDOS web and social media channels.
Video presentations for the June 12 and September 10 meetings will be posted on RDOS Regional Connections.

Project update: March 20, 2025
The assent voting opportunity for the Sage Mesa Water System has been postponed to allow for additional information to be collected and distributed to residents. The assent voting opportunity may be held in the fall of 2025, but a date has not yet been set.

Sage Mesa Water Service Area
West Bench Water Financial Information
For reference, click here to view the financial fact sheet for West Bench Water.
West Bench Irrigation District was taken over by the Regional District of Okanagan-Similkameen (RDOS) in 2011.
It was determined various infrastructure upgrades were needed, including a booster station, reservoir, and water mains.
Sage Mesa Water System Community Conversation
Updates
Utility Acquisition Assessment Process
The Regional District has received expression of interest letters from Sage Mesa Water and Public Service Co. Ltd to sell the water system to the Regional District. This utility is located in Electoral Area “F” on the west side of Okanagan Lake.
The Regional District has a Water and Sewer Utility Acquisition Policy that outlines specific activities for the transfer of utility systems. In order to capture and coordinate all acquisition aspects, the acquisition assessment process for the services is complex and methodical.
In January 2023, the Regional District and Sage Mesa Water and Public Service Co. Ltd entered into an agreement to explore the transfer of this utility ownership.
Successful completion of this transfer includes the initiation of due diligence for the Utility Acquisition.
The following outlines the Acquisition Assessment schedule;
- February 2023: Board approval to proceed with the acquisition process
- April 2023: Background information collection
- June 2023: Consultant hired to complete first main milestone: Engineering and Financial Assessment
- December 2023: Draft report review and revisions underway
- July 2024: Engineering Report finalized and presented to RDOS Board
- October 2024: Service area creation and borrowing bylaws received 3 readings at the Board and assent process was initiated
With direction to begin the assent process, where the public votes on the RDOS taking over the utility, public engagement is initiated.
The meeting scheduled for October 30, 2024, will be the first of several events in the coming months to discuss the assent process and financial implications, and answer questions.
FAQ
- If the assent of the voters is received, what does the rollout look like
- If the assent of the voters is not received, what happens?
- Where do the grants come from and what is the likelihood of a successful application?
- Is the RDOS aware of other water systems around the province that may also be seeking grants?
- If assent is not received, would Interior Health (IH) place pressure on the province to make improvements to the water system?
- When would property taxes increase if the assent is received?
- When would residents see improvement in the quality of their water?
- Can projects be made “shovel ready” without first committing to acquiring the system and the loan authorization bylaw?
- Can the availability of grants be more certain before residents have to agree to the loan amount?
- When the Sandstone subdivision was constructed, was the developer supposed to pay for a replacement reservoir?
- Is there currently a reserve fund for the system?
- What is the private owner’s responsibility?
- When West Bench was taken over by the Regional District, was the RDOS successful in obtaining grants?
- Is it possible to just connect to the City of Penticton’s water system instead of going through an assent process?
- Why is the reservoir replacement a priority?
- Would the service area be the whole of the Sage Mesa water system or just a part?
- Is there an opportunity to look at the construction of a sewage disposal system at the same time as water system upgrades?
- Would a new reservoir improve water pressure?
- Who currently performs the water testing?
- Would Interior Health pressure the province for improvement when they see poor results?
- What was the cost of the final report submitted by McElhanney regarding the engineering and financial assessment of the Sage Mesa water system?
- Page four of the McElhanney report recommends connecting to the Penticton water system as the most cost-effective. Why is the RDOS now introducing Penticton Indian Band (PIB) into the equation after the report has been completed?
- Would grants awarded to PIB, only cover upgrades to reserve infrastructure?
- Is following the recommendations from McElhanney’s report the most cost-effective option?
- Has there been an engineering report completed on the costs of upgrades to the PIB water system?
- Where did the funds come from to pay McElhanney the $104,000 to provide the Engineering report?
- The McElhanney report does not include land acquisition for the new reservoirs. Do you mind explaining?
- Is the RDOS still planning on proceeding with a referendum spring 2025?
- Can the project be broken into smaller projects, prioritizing supply and storage only for the initial move to the RDOS?
- As done in other systems taken over by the RDOS, not all of the upgrades had to be on the table for the voting question, as long as the need to continue with the projects is identified to the ratepayers and grants can be continually applied for.